Editorial policy
How FrameAPI.com approaches technical explanations, primary sources, terminology, corrections, and the distinction between documented behavior and practical guidance.
Explain the concept accurately
FrameAPI.com focuses on the decisions behind visual workflows. Articles define the meaning of a frame in context and distinguish data types, timing systems, and operations that can otherwise sound similar. Search phrases such as “AI Frame API” describe a topic; they do not by themselves establish a standardized interface.
Use sources for technical grounding
Long-form guides include a primary editorial reference relevant to the central topic. Topic pages may connect several official references. Links to documentation support the technical context, while workflow examples express a proposed way to approach a task. Examples are illustrative unless the page identifies a measured result.
Keep model claims specific
AI capabilities depend on the model, inputs, task, and evaluation. Labels such as “frontier” or “super intelligence” do not replace a documented capability or an appropriate test. We aim to describe limitations and uncertainty where they affect the reader’s decision.
Handle changing information
Platform requirements and software behavior can change. Readers should consult the linked primary documentation for version-specific details before implementing a workflow. A page’s publication date identifies its editorial placement; material revisions should be recorded when the content changes.
Make corrections useful
Send corrections to [email protected] with the page URL and supporting evidence. A specific reference, version, and reproduction context help distinguish a factual error from a difference in setup or interpretation.
Independent coverage
Brand and product names identify the technologies being discussed. Their presence does not imply a partnership, certification, endorsement, or that FrameAPI.com provides the named organization’s services.